Do you remember the hysteria surrounding Ebola? – The
political Right calling for closing airports and air flights, denying entry to
all from Africa, quarantining anyone who might have been suspected – even
though the NIH was assuring us all was medically under control? Of course the
epidemic was properly contained. So, a week later, where was the apology from
those pundits that were certain that the epidemic was going to sweep through
the U.S.? Where was the embarrassment from those “experts” that all their fear mongering
and inducement of panic was for naught? After all, they got on TV. They got on
talk radio. They cast Obama in a bad light for a couple of days. They
influenced what was highlighted in political “Talking Point” memos. That’s all
they wanted. No apology. No embarrassment. No sense of responsibility for
scaring most of us half out of our wits. Use the political moment. Manipulate it.
Drop it when it’s over. Wait for the next opportune “crisis.” That seems to be
the pattern – both on the Right and the Left.
Today the House passed a bill stopping the
immigration of Syrian refugees. I remember several times when, following a mass
shooting and calls for gun safety legislation, lawmakers would say, “Even
though the public is horrified, let’s wait a while. We shouldn’t act in haste and
in the spur of the moment.” Why isn’t this treated the same way? Other than
quick political capital, I have no idea.
I am trying to keep that recent Ebola episode of
false panic and knee-jerk political response in mind as the tragedy in Paris
unfolds.
The following is an article written by Rabbi Michael
Lerner I received in an email Thursday (11/19). [Copyright © 2015 Network
of Spiritual Progressives®. Rabbi Michael Lerner, 2342 Shattuck Avenue, #1200,
Berkeley, CA 94704]. I am still out of town. Although I hadn’t
planned on sending a message this week, it is too important not to. Although I
don’t necessarily agree with all Lerner’s suggestions, I am quoting extensively
from his article. Go to their website [www.spiritualprogressives.org]
and subscribe to their emails and magazine. It always provides good and thoughtful
information.
Try to remember, if you find yourself in an argument
about any of this, always ask the Holy Spirit to guide your response – what to
say, what not to say, or if you need to say anything at all. Then quiet your
mind and listen for His whispers. The loud voices you hear are those of your
own ego.
I
have seen on social media and heard from friends the depth of fear that is
permeating our society since the attacks in Paris. Seeing and hearing the
stories of Parisians who were impacted by the attacks is bringing the violence
home in a way that is similar to 9-11. The media is bringing the lives and
sorrows of Parisians into our homes with interviews, photos and stories of
their lives. This pierces the veil of security and safety in ways that the children
washing up on the shores of Europe, starving children around the world and
bodies in Beirut did not do. When our government is sending drones into
communities, dropping bombs in far away lands, and supporting economic policies
and sanctions that create daily suffering and death around the globe, it does
not pierce our sense of safety because we can easily (and even realistically)
tell ourselves this will not happen to us. We will not be the target of a drone
strike or a U.S. bomb and we fail to see the connection between U.S. economic
policies on the daily suffering around us as clearly as an attack of the
magnitude we saw in Paris. It is as if
you can imagine, as one friend said, “Coming soon to a café or theater near
you.”
So
what do we do? How do we respond? Can we really be safe in a world in which
violence seems to be the only response to violence? And if so, how? What would
you do if someone entered a theater and started shooting? (I want to
acknowledge that the likelihood of being killed by a young white man at a
school or in a movie theater, or by a drunk driver or in a random car accident,
or, if you are African American by a police officer is far greater than the
likelihood of being killed by Daesh [ISIL/ISIS] and yet at this particular moment,
that is what is most terrifying.)
I
want to explore what underlies this fear, how the Right (and even the hawks on
the Left) capitalize on this fear to push their pro-war, pro-weapons agenda and
how we might respond in the face of knowing that ultimately there is no way to
protect ourselves from random acts of violence anymore then there is a way to
protect ourselves from random accidents.
When
tragedies like Paris (I am focusing on Paris, not to minimize the tragedies in
Beirut, Syria, Iraq, Kenya, but instead as an acknowledgement that it wasn’t
until the attacks in Paris, or attacks in the U.S., that the veil of safety was
shattered) happen, we feel horrified, terrified and often enraged. One of the
reasons it impacts us more powerfully than the other places I mentioned above
is because many of us could imagine us sitting in a café or being at a concert
in Paris (or we can easily imagine that if it can happen in Paris, it can
happen in our own backyard). And so we, understandably, get very scared and we
want to know what we can do to protect ourselves and be safe.
What
is being triggered is our own sense of vulnerability and powerlessness. We all
have a desire to have some say and power over our lives and our destiny, over
how we will live and die. What happened
in Paris, in some profound way, got under our skin so to speak and powerfully
and violently reminded us of how very fragile and vulnerable we really are.…
And when that happens, we have to confront our fear, our impotence, our
vulnerability and ultimately our powerlessness.
How
do we do that? Naturally we respond by wanting to lash out, to defend, to
create safety for ourselves, to try to figure out how we could be safe if, God
forbid, a shooting or a suicide bomber came to a theater or café near us.… This
fear permeates us at a cellular level. It is a natural and primal response to
terror.
And
the Right and hawks on the Left are capitalizing on that fear, by rallying for
more weapons, more bombs, more destruction, and ultimately more war…. I have to
ask, do they really believe that more bombs will build a safer world? They’ve
been dropping bombs for years and still the world is not safe. And the double
standard, while not surprising, is disturbing nonetheless. When France, the
U.S. and Western countries kill hundreds of innocent people that is not terror,
but when Daesh (ISIL/ISIS) kills innocent people it is terror. And yet, that
dichotomy is easily picked-up by the warmongers in the West and manipulated to
buttress their calls for perpetual war. [That dichotomy is also used by
ISIL to recruit more terrorists. We want to react by distrusting any and all
Muslims. So, ISIL tells potential recruits, “See, the western infidels think of
Muslims as second-class people. Marginal. Expendable.” - DLO]
This
is the case even though we know that violence and attacks only lead to more
weapons, more bombs, and more destruction, bringing the devastation and
destruction coming closer and closer to home. The hawks quickly respond with
answers (we will crush them eventually, they cannot out fight us) but their
answers are empty of a real solution. But what they do very well and
effectively is speak to and address the real fear that lives within us. That
helps, on some level, to make (some of) us feel better and that is the draw and
strength of their short-sighted, short-term responses. But what they ignore are
the long-term needs and strategies that can actually address the underlying
problems and begin to truly undermine and dismantle terrorist groups around the
globe.
When
you try to make this argument, they often respond that we have to address the
immediate threat and then we can address the long-term, underlying problems.
Yet we know that they never actually move beyond the short-term solution
because it sucks our resources and energy and because most of them do not
believe that we have contributed to the underlying problems that would explain
these acts of terror.
And,
at the same time, we have to acknowledge that there is still this burning
desire to think we can do something, anything to protect ourselves. We need to
acknowledge and respond to this need to have a sense of power over our lives,
to be able to create the world we want, and to be safe.
But
what if more wars and more weapons are not the answer? … What if the wake-up
call of these kinds of acts are to help us see that the only real response
(once we recognize the existential crisis of being alive, being vulnerable, not
knowing if we will live or die today and try to find some acceptance and peace with
that while we go about living our lives and perhaps in remembering our
vulnerability we choose to live our lives more fully, love more
unconditionally, and be more generous and kind) is to build a movement and take
back our country and our world. Perhaps this moment is a call to action – not
to create a false sense of safety or security or to turn more inward – for
ordinary people to rise-up and lead because our leaders are failing us. They
continue to promote and use the same strategies of violence, weapons and war to
try to bomb the world to peace and impose global capitalism around the globe.
And yet we know this strategy and approach has not worked for thousands of years
and it will not work now.…
This
is our power. Decades ago enough mothers got outraged enough about their
children dying in car accidents by drunk drivers that they created Mothers
Against Drunk Driving…. It is time for
the mother bears of the world to rise (and for the papa bears to join us) and
say “enough is enough.” We will not be safe until everyone on the planet is
safe. Until all lives are valued. Until everyone has the resources they need to
live peacefully, securely, eat healthy food, have drinking water, education,
functioning communities, healthcare, etc. We need to stand-up in a loving,
compassionate, powerful and nonviolent collective way and demand that our
leaders do what is needed to build a safer world for ourselves and everyone
else on the planet and to make it clear that more weapons and more violence is
not the path. I don’t think we can actually figure out how to protect ourselves
if some determined person (or people) with weapons that are often manufactured
by U.S. companies (43 of the 100 largest weapons producers are U.S. companies,
including 8 of the top 10 and the 3 largest) end up being used to wreck terror
and havoc in a theater or café near us, but we do have the power to build a
massive movement to demand a change in our policies and approaches. And when our pain and fear are strong and
powerful enough, we will mobilize because we will realize we have no choice. I
hope that time comes sooner rather than later.
If
you feel that way now, and want to be part of the solution to actually building
a safer world, then how about joining the Network of Spiritual Progressives and
help promote our Global Marshall Plan and Environmental and Social
Responsibility Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and help us recruit hundreds
of thousands of people so we can mobilize people to take to the streets in
massive nonviolent civil disobedience demanding that those who support
continued wars and those who support weapons industries either withdraw their
support or we will vote them out of office. This is a crucial moment in
history. Let’s capitalize on it ourselves rather than leave it to the
warmongers to do so because we know what will happen if they do. With a massive
movement, we can turn to the light and away from the darkness but to do so will
require each and everyone of us to get out of our offices, our houses, our
schools, our communities and even our comfort zones and take to the streets.
What
do you say?
Copyright
© 2015 Network of Spiritual Progressives®.
Rabbi
Michael Lerner
2342
Shattuck Avenue, #1200
Berkeley,
CA 94704
