What are we to do when it
appears that being right, being happy and being involved all seem to be in
conflict? Part 1
Following last week’s message,
“I Don’t Have To Be Right To Be At Peace” [Msg-2-June-2012] I received a
pertinent question from a good friend and subscriber. She had been teaching a
group of spiritualists for over 3 hours. In an email to me, she asks (and I
quote): “After a very successful 3 hours of teaching I
was moved to talk about charlatans in the metaphysical field and how so many
are seeking, even as Creflo Dollar [Note: An Evangelical minister who preaches that
God’s salvation can be quantified as monetary success]
has decided, and is teaching that we are Spiritual Beings having a human
experience. I referenced Jim Jones and the kool-aid in his back pocket. I
got shouted down that we are all one and if someone gets "taken or mislead"
it is part of their path. I thought about that and just can't come to terms
that we have no responsibility or due diligence … to warn and give signs to
watch for…. We don't tell our children to cross the street without
first teaching them to watch for traffic, or not to put their hand on a hot
burner without educating them about hot burners.
“…. Those experiences simply leave me
wondering about the rose colored glasses and the ideal world that some are able
to create for themselves.”
I have
written before in these messages that there is always a conflict within me
about the idea that … “We are to be IN this world without being OF
this world.” Where I draw the line-in-the-sand between the two is not a
once-and-it’s-done event. My line between being in, not of, this world can
shift by the hour – depending on the situation, the event, and the people
(including me). My perceptions shift that suddenly. I’m sure yours do, too.
I don’t,
however, want to try to explain the inner intentions/beliefs of those described
by the emailer as wearing “rose colored glasses” or having some “ideal” world
they imagine.
The
spectrum from being IN the world to being OF the world stretches from the
Hindu purist who can watch a baby drown because it is the baby’s Karma, all the
way to meddlesome religionists who are trying to control and regiment
everyone’s life, because they are convinced they are doing what they perceive
is the Will of God.
Most of
us are in the muddling middle between these two extremes.
I have
learned a very critical spiritual truth getting sober in AA: I share myself and
the positive changes that take place in me as I work AA’s Twelve Step Program,
understanding that:
- · Some listeners will objectify or intellectualize my message without seeing my humanity existing in their own life.
- · Some will take my lessons to their hearts.
- · Some will be too busy convincing themselves that what’s happened to me is totally irrelevant to them.
That’s
the decision of the listener. Regardless of the listeners’ responses, I do NOT
NOT share myself – honestly and completely!
Continued
in Part 2
No comments:
Post a Comment