Saturday, February 22, 2014

Be Still And Know The Whispers Of God

I was asked recently about knowledge of the Will of God. A Course in Miracles (ACIM) tells us we only have free choice, not free will. As already-loved spirits eternally united with the Father, our will is the same as God’s, of Whom we are One. We can choose, however, to ignore His Will because our minds have split – the price of free choice. We have a lower egoic mind and a higher mind that can be trained to listen for God’s Will. When we choose incorrectly, we simply err. Then, we can choose again. What most would call “sin,” we now recognize simply as an errant choice.
The question then becomes: How do we know the Will of God? As the 11th Step in Alcoholics Anonymous states: “[We] sought through prayer and meditation to improve our conscious contact with God as we understood Him, praying only for knowledge of His will for us and the power to carry that out.”
When I asked this question of a revered woman and wonderful friend in Saint Augustine, she nodded that it was a significant question. She advised me to listen for the whisper of the message that would appear. Margaret Meharg was her name. She was in her eighties and still spoke with her strong Irish brogue.  She was a marvelous lady. When I called her “Quad-M” (for Magical Mystical Mother Margaret), she would always laugh. She referred to me as her boyfriend. That would always make me feel very good inside.
She told me, “The loud voices you hear are your ego voices.” Then she would begin to chortle: “I have many of these voices, Don. But by practicing, I have learned to pay attention to the quiet ones. It’s not a 100 per cent, but I get pretty close most of the time I think.”
But I’m used to loud. I’m used to flamboyant. I’m used to ostentatious. Anything subdued doesn’t grab my attention. I’m used to multi-tasking – listening to several of my louder voices all at once. I’m used to constant stimuli. I don’t like quiet. I don’t like stillness. It’s boring. When someone describes Heaven in terms of no conflict, no concern, no want, no desire, singing hymns and playing harps all day – I mean what a monotonous existence that would be to do for all eternity.
There is an article in the February 2014 issue of BBC’s Focus Magazine by Helen Czerski – part of her “Everyday Science” commentaries (page 29). Although she is discussing the wonder of breath, it was a spiritual parable for me. “Cold clear days are wonderful at this time of year – I love it when the outside feels fresh and clean but I can also feel my nose and cheeks burning from the chill. If it’s cold enough, I also get to see something that is completely invisible for the rest of the year even though it’s always there. The reward for being outside on these days is being able to see your own breath, and to look at what it gets up to after it leaves your body…. The reason I like this … is that air is moving all around us all the time, but we can only tell if part of it pushes on our skin hard enough for us to feel it. Being able to see it too is a bit like having a temporary superpower, except that I’m not sure this one will help you defeat any enemies. When I breathe out, I can see what happens as one batch of air is pushed into another one. At the edges, there are chaotic swirls coming and going. This is turbulence, and it’s mixing the two lots of air together. Turbulence is a far better way of mixing things than just letting them slowly merge – that’s why you stir your tea after putting milk in, rather than just letting it mix itself. Outside on a cold day I’m happy to stand and watch the air I’ve just breathed out. I can see the tiny swirls mixing the carbon dioxide I’ve exhaled with that from the other living things around me. And then I imagine all the swirls that I can’t see directly, the ones made when I push air out of the way when I walk, the ones that rush out as I close doors, and the giant ones made as the wind blows over the hills. Air is almost never completely still and we spend our lives surrounded by shifting and dynamic air molecules. Our atmosphere is being continually mixed up by turbulent swirls, but this enormous atmospheric dance is mostly invisible. ”
I spend so much of my day believing, acting, reacting, planning, plotting, listening to my louder voices, dodging, and weaving – as if the people, traffic, politics, and anger I sense is all there is – that I cannot see my breath and all the other invisible (to me) “real” events going on. If it’s invisible, I seem to be saying, it doesn’t exist.
“Be still and know that I am God,” the prophet admonished me, just as Margaret instructed me, as well. Listen for the whispers, not the shouts. I understand that what I perceive with my five senses doesn’t mean that’s all there is. Intellectually, I comprehend that. However, to cultivate and listen for the voice of intuition or the whisper of the Holy Spirit requires some discipline, practice, and dedication on my part. Reading Bible verses is not the same as “…being still….” Reminiscing is not the same as “…being still….” Sitting in nature, while your mind runs undisciplined from topic to topic is not the same as “…being still….” Watching or listening to mindless television is not the same as “…being still….” Lying quietly on my bed and reliving past experiences – painful or pleasant – is not the same as “…being still….” 
As I sit outside and write this on a windy, but unusually warm February day, I watch a leaf being blown first left, then right, then round and round. I’m reminded of Czerski’s words and the invisible turbulence occurring in my patio: There’s more to life than I sense; I need to watch for the reality of the invisible; I need to listen for the whispers.
Although these messages are mostly for me, thanks for listening. As always – feel free to forward this message to your friends, family, and those accompanying you on your spiritual journey.
Don
#4 February, 2014

Copyright, 2014

Sunday, February 16, 2014

Spiritual Progress Rather Than Spiritual Perfection

Last week I wrote: “The fact that I was so exasperated tells me I was hell-bent on being right or correct. That was my mistake. It was an error. It was not a “sin” that I wanted to be right or correct. It was a mistaken choice I made. I can always choose again…. And that is exactly what the Course teaches. The world we create with our perceptions is only as real as a dream. What we call “sin” in our created world is really just an error of perception. If we are willing, the Holy Spirit will help us change our perception. When that happens, our “world” will change. What we’ll begin to perceive is the “real” world that Christ-Eyes behold. We’ll see the Christ in all others, albeit through the fear, guilt, anger, resentment, and defensiveness that covers up the light of the Christ in each of us.
“That’s the promise of the Course in Miracles. That’s what’s happened to me in AA. Although I could not imagine life without alcohol, I experienced that sober life. I experienced a life of acceptance. I experienced a life of living “just for today.” After 183 “just for today” days I had 6 months of sobriety. After 365 “just for today” days I had a year. After 9,490 “just for today” days I had 26 years. Looking back on my path to sobriety, can I pinpoint the day my perception changed? Nope. Does that denigrate my change in perception? Nope. Does my use of non-biblical words do dishonor to my experience of the Holy Spirit in my life? Nope.
A subscriber took issue with some of my words from last week. Specifically, the issue was: “We’ll see the Christ in all others, albeit through the fear, guilt, anger, resentment, and defensiveness that covers up the light of the Christ in each of us.” The comment said I was implying the Holy Spirit does not totally change us.  The writer also commented on my sentence: “Does my use of non-biblical words do dishonor to my experience of the Holy Spirit in my life? Nope.” The comment here was that I cannot use the words ‘Holy Spirit’ without having referenced the Holy Bible, from whence came these specific words. Therefore, one has to be a Christian, believing in the Scripture, before one can ask the Holy Spirit for anything.
I understand what’s being said and where that doctrine came from. I used to teach it myself. The Holy Spirit is one facet of the triune Godhead that we know from the experiences, creeds and tribunals of the early Church Fathers as they wrestled with the Holy Bible – what to put in it, what to leave out, and how to interpret it.
However, as I read the New Testament through my eyes of 26 years of sobriety, acceptance, and transformation, I envision people who underwent similar transformations in the presence of Jesus the Christ or where His Spirit was palpable. They were changed and were never the same. Their transformation had nothing whatsoever to do with what they believed “happened” to them. It had nothing to do with how they verbally “explained” their experience. Their transformation, as was mine, is beyond words; but, because it’s so significant to us, that doesn’t stop us from trying to verbalize our experiences.
I have experienced in AA meetings the reality that each of us can tell our stories and, although the specifics are very, very different, the stories are always the same. Why wouldn’t that reality also be true for those early Christians 2,000 years ago?
If I learned that folks in AA were poo-pooing the reality of other’s spiritual transformations as they worked the 12 Steps and they poo-pooed them by quoting from my story, I would be horrified. Whether or not someone verbalizes their spirituality in the way I do, has absolutely nothing to do with the reality of their spirituality.
If I use the words “Holy Spirit” and someone else uses different words – Higher Power, Spiritual Consciousness, Enlightened Self, etc. – what difference does it make? It doesn’t. They are simply words. If I can understand and accept that, so can the triune Godhead.
As far as my reference to “…seeing the Christ in all others, albeit…” that is simply an acknowledgment that I am imperfect. I love the fact that AA describes all our movement toward having a spiritual experience in this way: “We are not saints. The point is, that we are willing to grow along spiritual lines. The principles we have set down are guides to progress. We claim spiritual progress rather than spiritual perfection.” [Alcoholics Anonymous, Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, Inc., 4th Edition, p. 60]
Fearfulness demands that I be assured I am right. It assuages my anxiety. I am aware of that. Therefore, I try my best not to correct or criticize how someone else describes their reality. Instead I try to listen to their truth behind their words. Sometimes I get it. Sadly, often I still get caught up in my stuff.
Although these messages are mostly for me, thanks for listening. As always – feel free to forward this message to your friends, family, and those accompanying you on your spiritual journey.
Don
#3 February, 2014
Copyright, 2014

Sunday, February 9, 2014

The Reality Of My Dream Is The Reality Of My Life

The other night I had a dream (or two – I can’t remember) and when I awoke, even though I couldn’t remember the particulars, I felt very disturbed. I was cranky most of the morning and felt very negative about – well, almost everything.
In my dream someone had been arguing with me (or me with them) and it was very upsetting to my equilibrium. I had been trying to make a few critical points from a specific perspective and these other people just couldn’t (or wouldn’t?) “get” it.
For example, let’s pretend we were talking about houses. [Please remember I cannot recall the specifics of the dream].
It was as if I said that, in general, all houses are very similar. All houses have floors, walls, ceilings, roofs, doors and windows. They provide protection from the weather. They provide a sense of safety and security. They provide a sense of “being home.” The other people in the dream vehemently disagreed. They stated – over and over – that there are brick houses, vinyl-sided houses, stone houses, underground houses, beautiful, large manor houses, and small, tin-roofed tar-paper shacks.
I couldn’t get them to budge from their perspective about how the house was built or how it looked and, instead, to consider the function of the house. In the dream I was ready to have a conniption fit.
How you view a house depends on your perspective or perception. If you’re a detailed personality, perhaps you’ll think about all the differences in the style of houses and agree with the view that there are brick ones, vinyl-sided ones, etc. If you think in a functional manner, perhaps you’ll agree with the over-arching description of what defines a house and agree that they all are the same – functionally.
I woke up with that feeling and that generalized exasperation lasted all morning.
In this example of my dream, I was very frustrated that the people I was with had only one way of looking at the issue at hand. They seemed to have blinders on. Their response to me sounded much like politicians we’ve all heard. They seem to have only one thing they are prepared to say. Regardless of what is asked of them by a reporter, they will give their scripted response.
Reporter: “So, here’s the newly elected Congressman from [State]. Congressman, what is one of the most important issues for you in the upcoming session?”
Congressman: “The most important issue for me is the [fill in the blank].”
Reporter: “You seem a little fidgety. Let’s relax. What did you have for breakfast this morning?”
Congressman: “I cannot remember. I was so focused on [fill in the blank] that I’m not sure I even had breakfast.”
Reporter: Well, I saw you in the hotel’s dining room. You were with Senator Blowhard. Okay?”
Congressman: “I can’t remember. I was so focused on [fill in the blank]. I can’t recall.”
Reported: “What if I catch up with you at the break?”
Congressman: “Okay, but I’ll be so focused on [fill in the blank] that I hope I’ll remember to talk with you.”
Frustrating. Exasperating. That’s how I felt almost all morning.
The fact that I was so exasperated in my dream that it carried over into most of my awakened morning, tells me I was hell-bent on being right or correct. That was my mistake. It was an error. It was not a “sin” that I wanted to be right or correct in my dream. It was just a dream.
And that is exactly what the Course teaches. The world we create with our perceptions is only as real as a dream. What we call “sin” in our created world is really just an error of perception. If we are willing, the Holy Spirit will help us change our perception. When that happens, our “world” will change. What we’ll begin to perceive is the “real” world that Christ-Eyes behold. We’ll see the Christ in all others, albeit through the fear, guilt, anger, resentment, and defensiveness that covers up the light of the Christ in each of us.
That’s the promise of the Course in Miracles. That’s what’s happened to me in AA. Although I could not imagine life without alcohol, I experienced that sober life. I experienced a life of acceptance. I experienced a life of living “just for today.” After 183 “just for today” days I had 6 months of sobriety. After 365 “just for today” days I had a year. After 9,490 “just for today” days I had 26 years. Looking back on my path to sobriety, can I pinpoint the day my perception changed? Nope. Does that denigrate my change in perception? Nope. Does my use of non-biblical words do dishonor to my experience of the Holy Spirit in my life? Nope.
It’s simply my miracle. In fact I am a miracle.
Although these messages are mostly for me, thanks for listening. As always – feel free to forward this message to your friends, family, and those accompanying you on your spiritual journey.
Don
#2 February, 2014

Copyright, 2014

Sunday, February 2, 2014

Individualism Versus Being Independent

Recently I read something that caused an eye-opening AHA moment for me. However, for the life of me I cannot remember where I read it. I just want you to know this observation is not original with me. The eye-opening thought was an observation concerning the difference between Individualism and Being Independent.
Here in the U.S. we are witnessing a movement couched in the framework of old-time freedom and independence – as in our 18th century patriots who fought the British for our independence. However, this newfound sense of “fighting for freedom from government” or protesting government’s “encroachment on our individual liberties” is NOT what our Founding Fathers were doing. Our Founding Fathers were not simply against the British government. More importantly, they were collectively FOR self-government and personal self-restraint for their common, collective good. Their sense of collective freedom rested on the necessity of collective responsibility.
We have confused a 21st century sense of individualism with our Founding Fathers’ 18th century concept of freedom and independence.
What is missing from today’s “patriots” is this sense of collective personal interdependence – this willingness and acknowledgment that each individual operates with self-restraint for the common, collective good of the nation. It is a belief that we are all in this together. We all protect each other. We all respect each other, even if we differ. We all respect the democratic process, which means we encourage the voting process, respect the opinion of the majority, and operate within the “rules” if we want to change the majority opinion. It is an understanding that we, as a country, are only as strong as the weakest part of our citizenry.
Individualism, as generally expressed today, is much more like the independent freedom as expressed by explorers, early mountain men, or the earliest settlers. It is an understanding that you are on your own, must make your own way, solve your own problems, and – most importantly – survive.
A sense of individualism is absolutely necessary for individual survival. By necessity survival is based on the concept “It’s all about me.”
A sense of interdependent personal freedom is absolutely necessary for a democratic society. Collective freedom rests on a sense of collective responsibility. By necessity a democratic society is based on the concept “It’s all about us.”
These two concepts are not the same. An individualistic concept of freedom may be collectively expressed as anarchy. An interdependent concept of social commitment may be collectively expressed as a representative democracy.
That set of distinctions really resonated with me.
Immediately I thought of similarities with the “me-ism” of growing segments of our population, exhibited in a growth of the use of social media and an “I-Am-A-Star” mentality – the kind of drive that motivates someone to post Facebook pictures of themselves or Tweet about their shopping experiences at a mall.
From a spiritual point of view this all may lead to a further sense of separation – solidifying the sense that “I am me and you are not,” and I have to take care of me and mine.  If that idea of individual separateness continues our spiritual growth as humankind will suffer a setback. On the other hand this “Star” mentality may lead to a growing sense of Oneness – a sense that others are truly NOT so different from me – a sense that, in truth, we are all united as one single human race living on a beautiful blue orb floating in space. This is the type of social media use we have already glimpsed in the Arab Spring uprisings.
If the latter occurs, perhaps we will continue to evolve towards a caring, sharing interdependent society rather than a competitive, individualistic survivalist social system.
Time will tell.
Although these messages are mostly for me, thanks for listening. As always – feel free to forward this message to your friends, family, and those accompanying you on your spiritual journey.
Don
#1 February, 2014

Copyright, 2014